Monthly Archives: June 2009

Review: Away We Go

Standard

Away_we_go_posterThe morning before I saw Away We Go I spent some time in a dentist’s chair to get some cavities filled. I was more uncomfortable during some of the scenes of the film than I was getting my teeth drilled. Not that all of Away We Go is cringe-inducing, but there’s enough stain on it to keep it from being a worthwhile entertainment.

Written by the husband-wife team of Dave Eggers and Vendela Vida, Away We Go carries much of what makes them distinctive in the literary world (I’ve never read anything by Vida, but I read Eggers’ Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius and know him as one of the main voices in the McSweeney’s vein of literature). To be sure, Away We Go is full of a kind of arch sentimentality and self-aware preciousness that overwhelms any hope that this film can resonate with authenticity.

The story concerns a young unmarried couple, John Krasinski and Maya Rudolph. She gets pregnant, and they decide they can live anywhere they want, so embark on a tour of some cities across North America, trying to find the perfect home. This odyssey is kicked off when Krasinski’s self-absorbed parents (Jeff Daniels and Catherina O’Hara) tell them they are moving to Antwerp before the baby is born. The characterizations of these two are pretty horrid, but they are mild compared to what’s to come.

Starting in Phoenix, the two visit an old colleague of Rudolph’s, Allison Janney. This is the first scene in which I wished I was back in the dentist’s chair. Janney is a fine actress, but what she is asked to do here is a crime. She plays a loud and obnoxious woman who openly insults her children and makes jokes about her sagging breasts that can be heard by anyone within fifty feet. She and her husband (Jim Gaffigan), who seems to be heavily medicated, take our couple to the dog track, a particularly bourgeois endeavor (we don’t see their home, which is no doubt decorated with prints by Thomas Kincaid).

If that scene wasn’t horrible enough, Krasinski and Rudolph next go to Madison, Wisconsin to visit a childhood friend of his. She is played by Maggie Gyllenhaal, and here we have another example of a good actress forced to inhabit a character that only exists in the revenge fantasies of writers like Eggers and Vida. She plays a college professor, and when she’s introduced breast-feeding a toddler, we know we’re in for a litany of new-age quackery. Sure enough, she and her husband (Josh Hamilton) aren’t really people, they are a chance for the filmmakers to vent against every cliche of holistic, hippie behavior known to man, even taking it into the realm of the unbelievable, such as Gyllenhaal’s objection to the concept of strollers.

These scenes highlight a certain tone that really rankles me–the filmmaker looking back at his audience and winking at us, saying “People! Don’t you just hate ‘em? Aren’t you glad you’re normal like us?” There is such vitriol in these scenes that it’s hard to contemplate where it stems from, other than that Eggers or Vida must have had some horrible friends in their lives.

Not all of Away We Go is like this. There are some lovely scenes in the film, especially when we focus solely on Krasinski and Rudolph. I liked a scene early on when they huddle in bed, their electricity out, and Rudolph wonders whether they are fuck-ups. Then, toward the end of the film, after they are dealing with Krasinski’s brother, whose wife has left him, there is a poignant scene between the two of them on trampoline. But those scenes can’t stand the weight of the general misanthropy on display in the rest of the film. I realize that for two people in love sometimes it can feel like they are the only sane people on Earth, but the ugliness of some of the characters in this film is too much.

The film is directed by Sam Mendes, and this is certainly a departure from his more polished and slick films like American Beauty, Road to Perdition, and Revolutionary Road. Away We Go is casually presented, like a shaggy-dog story, and appears to have filmed on the cheap. The look fits the kind of rambling mentality, though.

Krasinski, as the hirsute boyfriend, is fine, though he is asked to use his expression of a mixture of bemusement and incredulity that he specializes in on The Office. Rudolph is very good, excellently potraying the confusion and panic a woman in her situation would be going through.

Finally, there are some logistical problems that nagged at me. Krasinski is an insurance salesman of some type, though he certainly doesn’t dress like one (I doubt any insurance company would hire someone who shows up for an interview in a tweed sport coat and Hush Puppies). At the outset, they are living in what looks like near poverty (they have a cardboard window) but have no trouble funding unlimited travel across the continent. And the resolution of the film seems to be a complete real-estate fantasy.

I can’t recommend Away We Go, though it does have some admirable elements. In an attempt to isolate just what it is that makes a home for two likeable people, it manages to savage entire classes of people.

Review – The Odd Couple (1968)

Standard

the odd couple

(warning: contains very mild spoilers)

From the late 1960s to early 1980s one of the safest bets in the Hollywood film industry was a film based on the work of Neil Simon. An enormously successful playwright, he proved to be very appealing on film because of his exceptional comic skills, especially in writing witty and memorable one-liners.

The 1968 film ‘The Odd Couple’ – based on Simon’s 1965 play – is probably his most famous effort and one of his most successful films. It’s an apt reflection of Simon’s work, showcasing not only his many strengths but also his weaknesses.

Like many of Simon’s works, the plot is simple but appealing. Two long-standing middle-aged friends with recently broken marriages move in together and their contrasting personalities cause much friction. One, Felix Ungar (Jack Lemmon), is neurotic, uptight and obsessed with cleaniness while the other, Oscar Madison (Walter Matthau), is lazy, laidback and a slob.

The film is not without its flaws. As the ‘raison d’etre’ of the film is the byplay and relationship between Felix and Oscar, sections of the film where they’re not sharing scenes feel like padding (especially the opening 15 minutes which feel flat and dragged out). And Gene Saks’ direction is rather sluggish and uninspired, making it feel like it’s a filmed version of the stage play instead of a film in its own right.

But once Felix and Oscar come together, the film is a joy to watch. Not just because of the often superb one-liners and comic situations Simon creates, but because of the skilled performances and terrific chemistry Matthau and Lemmon have. They help ensure these are fully-fledged characters, making the film far more interesting through their relationship than if they’d become the caricatures they could have easily become.

The film’s peak is reached with a lengthy scene where Felix and Oscar have a double date with a pair of somewhat eccentric British sisters which is a masterclass of comic writing, timing and acting. Equally as good is the feuding between Felix and Oscar following the double date disaster which as a contrast has some very funny silent visual comedy followed by dialogue from Oscar listing his grievances about Felix which is probably the highpoint of the film (it can be viewed here).

Overall, this is an excellent comedy that deserves its reputation as one of the funniest Hollywood films of the last 50 years… and yet despite its many outstanding qualities this film can’t be rated as a truly great film. And in an unusual way Jack Lemmon’s performance exposes some of the reasons why.

Lemmon’s performance as Felix seems almost too truthful and honest as it inadvertently exposes the limitations of Simon’s work. The authenticity of Felix’s pain as he goes through divorce seems to clash with the tone of the film which wants to keep things at never more than a skin deep level, invariably falling back on smart one-liners at key moments instead of taking a risk and attempting something more rewarding. As good as a gag writer Simon was, even in his best works there was something constricting and even brittle about characters constantly engaging in conversations so heavily doused with one-liners and snappy retorts. As one critic one said, Simon’s films often feel like the main characters have professional gag writers living with them. That element is present in just about all of Simon’s works and probably prevents films like this from evolving into all-time classic status.

But one shouldn’t detract from the many exceptional qualities this film has. It is a top-class comedy that has held up very well over the years and one can only wish in vain that modern comedies of today would have acting and writing as sophisticated and funny as this.

Note: Image from http://www.movieforum.com/

COITuesday #6

Standard

Hello, people of the future. Not a very far future, perhaps (I scheduled this to appear tomorrow, I hope it will/did), but the future none the less. As you read this I am no doubt being chased by bears in the woods of the wild north, unable to get any wi-fi reception or even find a bathroom that flushes. It’s all good.

The success of Transformers 2 made me consider what the future holds in store for us. Maybe there will one day be giant robots that can transform into GM vehicles fighting on our surface for the survival or destruction of the human race, but for some reason I find it hard to do so. What I, coincidentally, found far more worrying and of more acute interest is the state of our intelligence, and how it’s evolving.

In a way this guy prompted it, because, while he is very passionate in his defense (which is admirable), he is espousing stupidity. “Don’t think so hard, dude. There are robots. Look at Megan Fox’s tits bouncing!” Don’t be boring. Don’t be a “snob”. Be fun. Be dumb. I’ll admit I will sometimes resort to this kind of defensive attitude over things I like but others call stupid (hello Brian thinking of Indy 4, hello me thinking of the snooze-inducing Bandits), everyone does it, but you have to draw the line between willing suspension of disbelief and retardation somewhere.

Idiocracy covered one possible outcome of where this kind of laissez-faire-les-Transformers attitude might lead us.

A film that’s been growing on me lately. Disappointed when it came out, since it could have been much better, but there’s something oddly topical about a show called “Ow my balls” and all the reassurances of “it’s got… electrolytes”.

Yet a cure for stupidity exists! Reading! Books! But for those disinclined towards such arduous activity there already exists a machine that can raise your talent level temporarily. Developed by Allan Snyder, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation can enhance your cognitive abilities for a limited time through electro-magnetic stimulating pulses to your brain (the name sort of gave it away). That already sounds like science fiction, but it’s been available for quite a while now. Its main use has been for helping people with depression and schizophrenia.

On top of all that there’s the future of controlling objects with your mind. This fall a toy will be released where the amount of concentration you use will determine if and how high you can keep a ball floating in the air. It’s not technically telekinesis, but close enough.

Two things struck me while watching that clip. One was that that thing is going to get real old, real fast. It’s the kind of toy that the boring geeks buy to impress and distract people at a party, and it does so for an hour or two. A $100 well spent? Second was that of all the things they could come up with using that technology for, all they could come up with was keeping a ping-pong ball floating in the air? Not even having something where you can compete with someone in concentration, trying to force it towards your opponent? Give him an electric shock if he loses, thereby making it harder for him to concentrate next time. Or mental Pong? The possibilities are practically endless already. And they chose to have it in a Star Wars package, with Yoda mewling in the background. It almost went from being cool to being sad.

So, in conclusion, while our intelligence may drive us to create the most amazing technology to realize the most profound things, be sure that we will use it in the dumbest and most commercialized way possible.

AGEBOC 09 – July 3-5

Standard

agebocfinalcorrected

Predict the #1 film for the weekend of July 3-5, 2009.

The one who predicts closest to the total Friday to Sunday gross for the #1 film wins 4 points. Runner-up gains 2 points. Predicting within half a million earns 2 extra points.

Bonus questions:

1) Will Ice Age 3 have the 3rd largest 3-day Independence Day weekend, counting from Friday July 3 2009? (Superman Returns has held that position for the last three years, with an adjusted opening of $57.58 million)
2) Will the Friday-Sunday take of Public Enemies be the largest Friday-Sunday take of Michael Mann’s career? Yes or no? (His largest until now is Collateral with an adjusted opening of $28.55 million)

Deadline is Tuesday June 30 at 11:59 pm (blog time).

To find out the rules of the game, go to the main thread for AGEBOC 09.

AGEBOC 09 score

cartoon_crown1_9cs9 James: 21

Rob: 17
Joe Webb: 13
Nick: 11.5
Jackrabbit Slim: 10
Brian: 7
filmman: 6.5
Marco Trevisiol: 6.5
Juan: 5.5
Jeanine: 6
Rhymerguy: 4

Opening in Chicago, Weekend of 06/26

Standard

Film snob alert: you know what I’m really looking forward to watching this weekend? My newly arrived Blu-ray of The Seventh Seal. Suck on that, Bay.

Big Man Japan (trailer)
Director: Hitoshi Matsumoto
There’s probably no way I’ll have time to see this, but seriously, watch the trailer. I haven’t seen a trailer this bizarre since … well, Kung Fu Hustle. Maybe.
Metacritic: 62

Cheri (trailer)
Director: Stephen Frears (High Fidelity, Dirty Pretty Things, Mrs Henderson Presents, The Queen)
Stephen Frears hits paydirt in his search to make a movie about a hot over-50 actress, after a horrible misfire with Judi Dench and a gamble with Helen Mirren that was a long shot to start with before finally being sabotaged by the makeup department.
Metacritic: 62

Jerichow
Director: Christian Petzold (Yella)
Apparently a German reworking of The Postman Always Rings Twice.
Metacritic: 72

My Sister’s Keeper (trailer)
Director: Nick Cassavetes (She’s So Lovely, John Q, The Notebook, Alpha Dog)
Talk about timely, here’s a movie that addresses the high-profile epidemic of people raising kids for the purpose of harvesting their sweet, sweet organs. I knew Jon and Kate were up to something!
Metacritic: 50

The Stoning of Soraya M. (trailer)
Director: Cyrus Nowrasteh
Parable about an Iranian woman who turns to Jesus when overcome with despair. Hint, hint, Iranians!
Metacritic: 52

Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (trailer)
Director: Michael Bay (Bad Boys, The Rock, Armageddon, Pearl Harbor)
I pretty much hated the first one … well, that’s not quite right. I didn’t so much hate it as much as I just thought it was unbelievably stupid. I came out of it dreading the sequel. After awhile, I started to consider skipping the sequel so that I wouldn’t have to dread it (there’s precedent for this – I skipped Bad Boys II on identical grounds. Over time, this developed into a general feeling that I would likely skip the sequel. Now, I’m wondering exactly what eternal horror God would have to threaten me with that would convince me to go. Fortunately, I suspect God is on my side in this matter, and I think I may instead actually stand to gain some kind of eternal reward for having the purity of soul required to abstain from defiling myself in such a crude and vulgar manner. Basically, what I’m saying is that I thank Michael Bay for getting me in touch with my spiritual side again. I haven’t felt this close to God since summer church camp back in 1991 (or maybe 1992?) when I refused to clean the horse stables, on the grounds that the kids actually going to horse camp should have to do that. God protects the righteous!
Metacritic: 36

Whatever Works (trailer)
Director: Woody Allen (Match Point, Scoop, Cassandra’s Dream, Vicky Cristina Barcelona)
Perhaps the saddest aspect to Michael Jackson’s passing is that we’ll never see his long-anticipated collaboration with Woody Allen, in which Jackson plays a self-absorbed middle-aged malcontent with a conspicuously young romantic interest. It would have been called Michael Bubbles Bahrain and whatever problems it would have had in the US market, it would have killed in Eastern Europe.
Metacritic: 47

Review: Moon

Standard

MoonposterWarning: This review contains mild spoilers about a plot point that occurs very early in the film, but you may want to experience it without knowing that, so tread lightly.

Duncan Jones has directed a nice quiet sci-fi film in Moon. It is not the most original piece of work, though, and as I watched it I counted the films that it reminded me of, including Silent Running, Solaris, and most especially 2001: A Space Odyssey, with the use of a computer with a spookily level speaking voice and its own agenda.

However, the nods to 2001 are, by the end of the film, clearly part of Jones’ plan, and he uses those cinematic references to catch snarky viewers like me off  our guard.

The simple premise of the film is that a new form of energy is being mined on the moon. A one-man crew, assisted by a computer, looks over things. That crewman is Sam Rockwell who, we are told, is near the end of a three-year contract. He is looking forward to returning to his gorgeous wife and their adorable little girl. At first you may wonder why a guy would leave a family like that to spend three years in isolation on the moon, but don’t get too critical, all will be answered.

Going out to investigate a mechanical problem, Rockwell crashes and is injured. When he awakens in the infirmary, the computer (called Gerty, and voiced eerily by Kevin Spacey) tells him that he will be fine in a few days. But Rockwell is suspicious, and when he goes out, against Gerty’s instructions, to the scene of the crash, he finds something shocking–himself.

I won’t go any further than that, but I needed to reveal that bit of plot to discuss the notion that the bulk of the film consists of Rockwell playing two parts, and the special effects involved to have both characters on screen at the same time. This is accomplished most effectively because Rockwell, even though he is playing two characters who are the same person, manages to make us see separate individuals. But the camera tricks are interesting. Jones starts with having them simply share the screen, but then it gets more complicated–they play a game of table tennis. Finally they are physically interacting, such as dressing each other or having a knockdown drag-out fight.

But I don’t mean to suggest that this film is about special effects. Instead it’s about identity, and what makes each of us unique. Discovering one has a doppelganger is surely very disquieting, and Jones and Rockwell both express this notion effectively.

I wouldn’t say the film is excellent, though, just good. At times it seems like an extended Twilight Zone episode. Though I understand what Jones was trying to do with Gerty vis-a-vis the HAL 9000 in 2001, I couldn’t help but spend half the film thinking to myself, “It’s been done” (but I did like the monitor on Gerty which showed his mood with a changeable Happy Face application).

Appropos of nothing, Jones is of course the son of David Bowie. I can only be grateful he did not name his main character Major Tom.

Composing online

Standard

Joe got flummoxed last week when I posted a link to the awesome inbflat.net on Facebook but not on the blog and he almost missed it. It is indeed great. I like combining the glass marimbas with the bass, the clarinet, the weirdo with the ambient voice and the flight of the red balloons sequence. It’s like my own little Michael Mann soundtrack.

Something I’ve been playing more with lately is the tonematrix by programmer André Michelle, based on Yamaha’s Tenori-On. Sometimes I’ll just let the mouse slide around randomly on that board and come up with the strangest, hypnotic pling-plong.

There is also something called Audiotool, where you can have a whole set of amplifiers, knobs and stuff, but that’s way too complex and timeconsuming for me.

Thankfully there’s the slightly easier WD-1 DJ-trainer to practice on, even if its selections are pretty cheesy.

Then of course there’s just the plain weirdness that is Looptracks.net.

Tonematrix

Review: Summer Hours (L’heure d’été)

Standard

summerhours_bigposterBefore this film I had seen two of Oliver Assayas’ work: Demonlovers, which I found incomprehensible, and Boarding Gate, a standard and seamy thriller. Therefore I was totally surprised by Summer Hours, which on first glance appears to be a pastoral drama about artsy-fartsy French people, but on further investigation is a metaphor for the crumbling of European culture.

We begin at a gathering of the Marly family. The widowed mother, celebrating her 75th birthday, is obsessed with how her house and pieces of art will be distributed after her death. Her uncle was a famous painter and collector, and she seems to regard his legacy and these objects with more affection than her own family.

She has three children, played by Charles Berling, Juliette Binoche, and Jérémie Renier. Berling is an economist who doesn’t consider economics a science, Binoche is an edgy designer of housewares, living in New York and working for a Japanese department store chain and Renier works for Puma sneakers in China. The matriarch, Edith Scob, recognizes that Binoche and Renier are unlikely to ever live in France again, so she urges Berling, who lives locally and will be the executor of her will, to sell everything.

When the old lady dies, the film goes into how the three siblings deal with her inheritance. Berling, sentimentally, wants to hang on to the past as much as possible, but recognizes the wisdom of Binoche and Renier, who tell him that having a country house in France is not a benefit to them. Binoche is marrying an American, and Renier is accepting a promotion that will keep him in China for the foreseeable future. His children speak French at home, but go to an English-language school and have a fondness for American culture.

This film says a lot of smart things and in clever ways. For example, the film is bookended by parties at the country house. The opening has children in a treasure hunt, romping through the verdant grounds as their ancestors could have. The close finds one of these same children, a teenage granddaughter, throwing a party for her friends, who arrive on noisy motorcycles, play loud music on their laptops, and pass around joints. Assayas shows us the global economy has chipped away at the vault of French culture (and by extension, the other old world nations) and is being replaced by a world culture that is like a rude guest at a garden party.

There is much to admire about this film. The script is like a Swiss watch in it’s structure and economy of parts. We hear Binoche and Renier say that they are unlikely to return to France, and then we realize that they have disappeared from the film. Asssayas also skillfully uses the camera. At times it is unmoving, as if we were seated at a party, and characters move in and out of frame. But then, as if we got up and are mingling, the camera moves through space, and his choice of when to do each are spot-on.

The acting is restrained and very good. Berling is the emotional center of the film, the man who tries to hold his family culture together at impossible odds. After some of his mother’s things are donated to a museum and he visits them, he remarks that they look like they are caged. Binoche is also very good as a woman who has more going on than she’s willing to tell us. There’s a fragility beneath her steely exterior.

I think the thing I most appreciated about this film was that it didn’t go where lesser films would go. After the mother dies there are numerous discussions of how the property should be divided, but for the most part the siblings come to accord. A lesser film would have been all about screaming matches, and the opening of old wounds. Assayas isn’t interested in simple family melodrama, though. There’s more afoot.

COITuesday #5

Standard

Kurt Kuenne is one of many talented filmmakers who do great and sometimes fantastic work that still never quite break into the mainstream. Last year he received the most attention so far in his career with the documentary Dear Zachary: A Letter to a Son About His Father, in which Kuenne chronicles the life of his friend Andrew Bagby for the sake of Zachary, Andrew’s son by way of the ex-girlfriend who murdered him and then fled to Canada. “A film worthy of comparison to Errol Morris’s seminal The Thin Blue Line” according to The Village Voice. I won’t review the film here, only say that it is perhaps one of the most wrenching, personal documentaries I have ever seen.

What’s also worth seeing are Kuenne’s short films, two of which are available on Youtube. The first one, Validation, stars TJ Thyne, most known for his role on the tv-show Bones. The other one, Rent-A-Person, stars James Haven, most known for being Angelina Jolie’s brother.

It’s cool seeing two short films whose stories intersect, but what is most impressive is how the two films manage to embrace high melodrama yet have a three-act structure that does not take the usual turns. It’s whimsical without being annoying; very sweet and upbeat without being cloying. Together they’re a half hour of your life well spent.

AGEBOC 09 – June 26-28

Standard

agebocfinalcorrected

Predict the #1 film for the weekend of June 26-28, 2009.

The one who predicts closest to the total Friday to Sunday gross for the #1 film wins 4 points. Runner-up gains 2 points. Predicting within half a million earns 2 extra points.

Bonus questions:

1) Will the Thursday to Sunday (note: excluding Wednesday, but including Thursday midnights) take of Transformers 2 be more or less than the first weekend of The Dark Knight ($158.4 million)?
2) Will My Sister’s Keeper earn more or less than Year One does this weekend?

Deadline is Tuesday June 23 at 11:59 pm (blog time).

To find out the rules of the game, go to the main thread for AGEBOC 09.

AGEBOC 09 score

cartoon_crown1_9cs9 James: 18.5

Rob: 16.5
Joe Webb: 13
Nick: 10.5
filmman: 6.5
Brian: 6
Marco Trevisiol: 6
Jeanine: 5
Juan: 5
Jackrabbit Slim: 5
Rhymerguy: 4

Opening in Chicago, 06/19

Standard

Food, Inc. (trailer)
Director: Robert Kenner
Newsflash: lots of mass-market food is bad for you and/or produced in ethically questionable ways. Maybe one of the reasons that documentaries typically bomb at the box office is that it’s so rare to see one distributed that doesn’t tell you things you almost certainly already know.
Metacritic: 80

Moon (trailer)
Director: Duncan Jones
This looks definitely worth seeing, my general dislike for Sam Rockwell aside. Trailer is strong, at any rate.
Metacritic: 63

Of Time and the City
24 City
Directors: Terence Davies (Of Time and the City), Jia Zhang-Ke (24 City)
The Gene Siskel Film Center is showing both of these films as a double bill called “Cities Past and Future.” Of Time and the City is Davies’ documentary about Liverpool, while 24 City is a fictional story set against the backdrop of a factory closing in Chengdu, China.
Metacritic (24 City): 75

The Proposal (trailer)
Director: Anne Fletcher (Step Up, 27 Dresses)
I don’t have anything to say about this movie, except that it occasions me to reflect that Bullock’s breakout in Speed, and hence my first job at the now-defunct Mandarin Corners cinema in Jacksonville, Florida, was fifteen years ago now. This makes me feel old – I was only 16 at the time. It means that almost as much time has passed between then and now as passed between the time I was born and Speed came out.
Metacritic: 52

Séraphine (trailer)
Director: Martin Provost
Winner of all kinds of César awards, which is actually not a bad indicator of quality. Recent winners include The Beat That My Heart Skipped, The Secret of the Grain, and Lady Chatterly, all films that were well worth watching. Certainly those are three much stronger films than the last three Best Picture Oscar winners. This one’s a film about the French painter Séraphine de Senlis, who I have never heard of.
Metacritic: 86

Tetro (trailer)
Director: Francis Ford Coppola (The Godfather, The Conversation, Jack, Youth Without Youth)
I saw Youth Without Youth, and while I can’t claim to have gotten much out of it, it seemed like the kind of movie that cinephiles 50 years from now will remember and bitch and moan about when Criterion puts out a Holo-ray of The Outsiders instead of Coppola’s shamelessly overlooked late-career gem. I’ll see Tetro because I expect it to be genuinely unique, like Youth, even if I perhaps won’t quite know what to make of it.
Metacritic: 63

Year One (trailer)
Director: Harold Ramis (Caddyshack, Vacation, Groundhog Day, Analyze This)
Apparently this is terrible (but Manohla Dargis likes it?), although I have to admit that I find Michael Cera’s bit to be ceaselessly amusing, similar to how I feel about Owen Wilson. In the end, I’m sad that Harold Ramis has apparently hit rock bottom, but I can’t say I didn’t see it coming. Analyze That and The Ice Harvest were both basically uselsss, and I didn’t even see Bedazzled.
Metacritic: 41

COITuesday #4

Standard

rhinestone princess

Princesses!

There has been some discussion here, as well as other places, over the lack of female protagonists in Disney fare lately. The response was that Disney has actually been focusing specifically on female role models these last few years, with their retro-fitted Disney Princess line (sales in excess of $3.5 billion). You go to their site and they have The Official Princess Website (funny how they can make stuff like the idea of princesses and old fairy-tales appear like their intellectual property), a predominantly pink website with sections where kids can learn to color in Cinderella and parents can learn “Parenting a Princess”.

Personally, I’m not against kids having role models, but in this case the artifice starts to crumble a little when you start asking questions about it. Is it okay for little boys to follow the princess line, i.e. can a little guy be a princess too? I didn’t find any pictures of boys with tiaras on the website. And what, exactly, does being a princess entail?

On Wikipedia there’s this perspective on princesses:

Yet another take on the rising popularity of being a “princess” is the gentleness and refined composure associated with the title. It often conjures images of elegance and self-control, and among the younger generations, is a depiction of all things feminine and lovely, yet in reality, a real princess is just a title given to one who is part of a royal family and does not necessarily mean that they are always like so.

Australia’s The Age has an an intelligent article on what it calls The Princess Syndrome. Even if the author of the article (Tim Hunter) can’t seem to come to a conclusion, it does make some interesting observations, such as “On a very basic level, princess stories are transformation tales [...] one of the classic narratives of social mobility.”

‘Social mobility’ in modern society is represented by consumerism. “Part of becoming a princess is getting a lot of good stuff: jewellery, clothes, and even houses. The shopping experience therefore is becoming closely linked to the princess experience,” Tim Hunter writes.

How does a princess achieve the transformation, this princess experience? By way of a man, of course! Prince Charming, to be precise. “The notion that women rise in the social stakes by virtue of the man they attach themselves to [...] that marrying well, especially financially, is desirable, so they can easily live the life of a princess.”

While the Disney princesses have become much more active lately, even in the case of the Disney Pocahontas who chooses country over man, nearly all of them have required a man to achieve their goals. Only Mulan is the notable exception, although she too returns home to her father. It’s like, if you don’t care to start a family yourself, take care of the one you have.

In a NY Times article entitled “What’s Wrong With Cinderella?” writer Peggy Orenstein, worried about the influence of the Disney Princess line on her young daughter, had another example of a princess who didn’t need a man.

I mulled that over while flipping through ‘The Paper Bag Princess,’ a 1980 picture book hailed as an antidote to Disney. The heroine outwits a dragon who has kidnapped her prince, but not before the beast’s fiery breath frizzles her hair and destroys her dress, forcing her to don a paper bag. The ungrateful prince rejects her, telling her to come back when she is ‘dressed like a real princess.’ She dumps him and skips off into the sunset, happily ever after, alone.

There you have it, ‘Thelma and Louise’ all over again. Step out of line, and you end up solo or, worse, sailing crazily over a cliff to your doom. Alternatives like those might send you skittering right back to the castle.

Orenstein’s article is worth a read, but she doesn’t come to any firm conclusions about the Princess line either. (She does note that pink was considered a masculine color up until the 1930s, something I didn’t know.)

Recently a marketing campaign from M&C Saatchi that was done for Disney, “Life should be a little more Disney”, was uncovered by the Super Punch blog.

Disney Burkha princess

More pictures after the jump.

Read the rest of this entry

AGEBOC 09 – June 19-21

Standard

agebocfinalcorrected

Predict the #1 film for the weekend of June 19 – 21, 2009.

The one who predicts closest to the total Friday to Sunday gross for the #1 film wins 4 points. Runner-up gains 2 points. Predicting within half a million earns 2 extra points.

Bonus questions:

1) Will Year One be the #4 most grossing film in the US this weekend? Yes or no?
2) Will The Hangover place over or under Up this weekend?

Deadline is Wednesday June 17 at 11:59 pm (blog time).

To find out the rules of the game, go to the main thread for AGEBOC 09.

AGEBOC 09 score

cartoon_crown1_9cs9 Rob: 16

James: 14
Joe Webb: 13
Nick: 9.5
filmman: 6
Brian: 6
Marco Trevisiol: 5.5
Jackrabbit Slim: 4.5
Rhymerguy: 4
Juan: 4
Jeanine: 3

Opening in Chicago, 06/12

Standard

One thing about doing this Thursday night is that the Metacritic ratings don’t include all of the Friday reviews. So, you know, buyer beware.

Away We Go (trailer)
Director: Sam Mendes (American Beauty, The Road to Perdition, Jarhead, Revolutionary Road)
I’m surprised by how much I want to see this, actually. I always thought that Maya Rudolph was one of the most talented SNL performers of the last decade or so, even if, like all SNLers, she had to rely too much on funny voices.
Metacritic: 58

Enlighten Up! (trailer)
Director: Kate Churchill
Sometimes I’ll be sitting in a movie theater, minding my own business, just waiting for the picture to start, when I’m hit for a trailer for a movie for which I have no idea how it ever got a distribution deal. This is one of those movies. I can open a year-end issue of Film Comment and read about 100 movies that were made around the world that I’d love to have seen but couldn’t, because someone instead decided to distribute a documentary about some jackass doing yoga. The free market in action, I guess.
Metacritic: not listed

Imagine That (trailer)
Director: Karey Kirkpatrick
It’s almost midnight so I’m not going to waste time coming up with a pithy comment.
Metacritic: 54

The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3 (trailer)
Director: Tony Scott (Spy Game, Man on Fire, Domino, Deja Vu)
Up until very recently, I thought this existed only to embarass people who used to be John Travolta fans. I mean, come on, he looks utterly ridiculous in the trailer. Tony Scott is usually dependable enough, however (besides his last two films, I mean), so I guess we’ll see.
Metacritic: 55

Tulpan (trailer at Zeitgeist Films site)
Director: Sergei Dvortsevoy
Following Nomad and Borat in a long, proud tradition of Kazakh films comes this tender comedy about a shepherd trying to romance his neighbor. Reviews are good enough that I’ll make time for it if at all possible – screw Terminator, right?
Metacritic: 90