Monthly Archives: June 2011

Review: Beginners

Standard

Beginners is a film that walks a tightrope, always threatening to topple into an abyss of preciousness and mawkishness, but it never does. It wobbles a bit, but for whatever minor sins it commits, it had me at the beginning, for the sublimely absurd moment of a man giving a dog a tour of his home, including showing him the bathroom.

Written and directed by Mike Mills, who previously made Thumbsucker, another pretty good movie that could have been an indie nightmare, Beginners is about a man weighed down by sadness, which is not exactly the kind of story that goes over well in pitch meetings. Ewan McGregor is Oliver who, as the film begins, is dealing with his father’s death. We learn, in flashback, that his father (Christopher Plummer), was a closeted gay man who only comes out after his wife dies.

The current storyline for McGregor is his relationship with a French actress, Melanie Laurent, that is one of the most bracingly honest depictions of a fledgling romance that I’ve seen in quite some time. This, even though they spend their first night together with her not speaking, due to laryngitis (they meet at a costume party, where McGregor is dressed as Sigmund Freud–how Freudian). McGregor and Laurent and the writing all exquisitely present an authentic example of how people become instantly enamored with each other.

The film bounces back and forth between McGregor’s last days with his father, who has embraced his homosexuality by finding a much younger lover and working for the gay rights movement, the relationship with Laurent, and a few far-too fleeting scenes of a young Oliver with his eccentric mother (Mary Page Keller), which could be expanded into a movie I would like to see. McGregor is also an artist of some sort, designing a CD package for a band called The Sads, which prompts him to draw a cartoon history of sadness.

All of this is framed in voiceover narration by McGregor, who moves around in time by showing us images from the years in question. This flirts with being too cute, but Mills holds the line. He also gets nervy by having the dog, an adorable Jack Russell terrier, speak in the form of subtitles. (His first line is “I can recognize 150 words, but I cannot talk”). This is the kind of thing that sounds terrible on paper but is actually very funny, and gives the film a likable weirdness that gets it past all the gloominess that surround the characters.

In an interesting coincidence, I saw this film on one of the biggest weekends in recent gay history–a gay pride weekend that was all the more sweeter after the passage of the gay-marriage bill in New York. However, the issue of Plummer’s gayness, which is prominent in the trailer, doesn’t seem to really matter. McGregor is surprised, but it’s not an issue for him, and it isn’t in the movie, either. It’s really almost superfluous, other than to depict a man who, at the age of 75, is finally being who he really is.

Beginners is a sweet, melancholy little movie, with good performances all around (although I look forward to the DVD with subtitles so I can actually find out some of the things Laurent said that I couldn’t make out). And, depending on how things shake out, Plummer may be in the running for an Academy Award nomination.

My grade for Beginners: B+.

AGEBOC ’11 – July 1-3

Standard

Predict the #1 film for the weekend of July 1-3 2011.

The one who predicts closest to the total Friday to Sunday gross for the #1 film wins 4 points. Runner-up gains 2 points. Predicting within half a million earns 2 extra points.

Bonus questions:

1. For the three-day weekend, will Larry Crowne earn more or less than Bad Teacher?

2. For the three-day weekend, will Monte Carlo earn more or less than 8 million?

Deadline is Wednesday, June 29 17:59 pm (blog time).

To find out the rules of the game, go to the main thread for AGEBOC 09.

Current rankings:

Jackrabbit Slim 16
Jeanine 15.5
Joe Webb 14.5
Filmman 13.5
Brian 12
Juan 10.5
Nick 9
Marco Trevisiol 6.5
Rob Hunter 4.5
James 2

Five Haikus on the Films of Michael Bay

Standard

By Adam Sternbergh, From the New Tork Times Magazine.

Bad Boys: Imagine
Hardy Boys with explosions.
And swears. Lots of swears.

For Armageddon
One question: Why not just teach
Astronauts to drill?

Epic Pearl Harbor
Was your Titanic, though not
In the way you hoped.

We suspect even
You, Michael Bay, can’t recall
Plot of The Island.

A third Transformers?
This franchise lasts longer than
The toys ever did.

Opening in Chicago, 06/24

Standard

Trying something a little different this week, in a bid to be more thorough.

Bad Teacher (trailer)
Director: Jake Kasdan (Zero Effect, Orange County, The TV Set, Walk Hard: The Dewey Cox Story)
Personal Interest Factor: 6
Looks funny, although the developing consensus that the trailer is funnier than the actual film is quite easy to believe. I’ll probably see it because of impending boredom, and because I’m starting to feel the movie mojo coming back after a few slow months for me, but I’m not expecting much.
Metacritic: 46

Cars 2 (trailer)
Director: John Lasseter (Toy Story, A Bug’s Life, Toy Story 2, Cars)
Personal Interest Factor: 6
I didn’t realize until just now that Lasseter himself directed this – I just assumed that some farmhand had been given the project, as with Toy Story 3. Not that it changes much, but at least it seems a little more like a personal project than a shameless sequel, even if the shameless sequel idea never made much sense because who wanted a sequel in the first place? By the way, Jeanine and I watched Cars again last night, and it holds up slightly better than I remember. I’m not sure if I’d still put it on the bottom of the Pixar rankings list; I think A Bug’s Life has taken over that spot. That said, a new Cars movie remains a deeply uninspiring idea.
Metacritic: 58

Trollhunter (trailer)
Director: André Øvredal
Personal Interest Factor: 5
Like a Norweigan Cloverfield except with trolls, is what I take away from it. I was going to say that I’m willing to be convinced … but I’m not so sure I am. This kind of thing just doesn’t do it for me.
Metacritic: 62

Also this week:
Buck (trailer) – horse whisperer doc
Conan O’Brien Can’t Stop (trailer) – Conan doc
The Last Mountain (trailer) – coal mining doc
Make Believe (trailer) – teenage magician doc
Pianomania – piano tuning doc
Rejoice and Shout (trailer) – gospel music doc

Review: The Tree of Life

Standard

The title of The Tree of Life is a common motif in most world religions–all of life is interconnected. That is why, I suspect, that Terence Malick, in his long-awaited film, attempts to tie the somewhat insignificant-seeming tale of a Texas family in the 1950s to the creation of the universe. The film is certainly not for the average moviegoer–there were walkouts and grumblings during the screening I saw. I’m not certain what it was all about, but I was never bored and frequently transfixed.

The film’s opening dialogue is a voiceover by the mother of the family (Jessica Chastain) distinguishing between the “way of grace and the way of nature.” She is of the way of grace, while her husband (Brad Pitt) is of the way of nature. He will attempt to teach their three sons the notion of survival of the fittest, making them tough. When he over-reacts at the middle child for speaking at the dinner table, she protests, and he tells her that she is always undermining him.

The eldest son, Jack (in a remarkable juvenile performance by Hunter McCracken) rebels against his father, even though he admits he’s more like him than his mother. When Pitt is away on a long business trip Jacks participates in antisocial behavior, like petty vandalism and animal abuse (he straps a frog to a rocket and shoots it into the sky, which I must admit is something that kids that I hung with did when I lived in Texas, although we had the decency to put the amphibian in a small capsule). There’s a great moment when Jack comes across his father working underneath the family car, with only a jack standing between him and mortality. The boy looks at the jack, fantasizes, and moves on, and then in a voiceover says, “Please God. Kill him.”

All of this sounds pretty normal, right? A simple, family drama? Well, early in the film Malick makes either a daring or foolhardy move, depending on your point of view. He embarks on about a twenty-minute history of the universe, starting with the big bang. He takes through the Earth’s volcanic stages, the creation of water, and even a scene involving dinosaurs. Tellingly, that scene involves one dinosaur committing an act of grace toward another dinosaur. It was during this scene I was reminded of Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey, though Malick’s seemed to have more purpose. All of it is lovingly rendered by the cinematographer, Emmanuel Luzbecki and the five credited editors.

There’s another aspect to the film that doesn’t work so well. Sean Penn appears as the grown-up Jack, working as an architect in a modern city. This is the first time Malick has ever set a film in the modern day, and he seems jumpy, as if he wandered into the ladies’ room by mistake and wants to get out as fast as possible. Sure enough he puts Penn in a dream-like desert surrounding, presumably in some sort of reminiscence about his childhood and the death of his brother (we learn about the death at the outset of the film, but we never know how he dies).

The Penn sequences take the film into an area that I can’t defend. The ending, set on a beach, has all the characters of the film together. It reminded me both of the end of Fellini’s 8 1/2, though without humor, and the beginning of Woody Allen’s Stardust Memories, with Allen’s film-within-a-film ending with all the movie’s characters gathered at a landfill. But that was a parody of pretentious, self-indulgent filmmaking, and for those who claim Malick’s film is just that, well, you may have a point.

But despite these flights of weirdness, I found The Tree of Life enthralling. The scenes of the family are so good, so attentively detailed. I loved Pitt’s performance as the wound-too-tight dad, who dreamed of becoming a musician but ends up adrift in business. The scenes between the boys are spot-on, and richly evoke a time of innocence and danger (they play with BB guns, light sockets, and run into clouds of DDT).

Another motif working through the film is the Book of Job. A church sermon during the film is on that book of the Bible, and Malick opens the film with an epigraph of God’s admonishment to Job: “Where were you when I laid the earth’s foundation…while the morning stars sang together and all the sons of God shouted for joy?” What does this all mean? I’m not quite sure, but may be in line with a portion of the Mel Brooks-Carl Reiner bit in “The 2,000-Year-Old Man,” when Brooks tells Reiner how man first started believing in God. I’m paraphrasing: “There was a guy named Phil who was the biggest and meanest guy, and bossed everybody around. Then, one day, Phil was struck by lightning. We realized that there’s something bigger than Phil.”

My grade for The Tree of Life: A-.

AGEBOC ’11 – June 24-26

Standard

Predict the #1 film for the weekend of June 24-26 2011.

The one who predicts closest to the total Friday to Sunday gross for the #1 film wins 4 points. Runner-up gains 2 points. Predicting within half a million earns 2 extra points.

Bonus questions:

1. Will Bad Teacher earn more or less than 23 million?

2. Will Green Lantern earn more or less than 21 million?

Deadline is Thursday, June 23 11:59 pm (blog time).

To find out the rules of the game, go to the main thread for AGEBOC 09.

Current rankings:

Jeanine 15.5
Filmman 13
Jackrabbit Slim 13
Brian 12
Juan 10.5
Joe Webb 10
Nick 8
Marco Trevisiol 6.5
Rob Hunter 3.5
James 2

Opening in Chicago, 06/17

Standard

The Art of Getting By (trailer)
Director: Gavin Wiesen
Personal Interest Factor: 4
Not sure what this is, except that it stars Freddie Highmore, who was last seen as the kid in Willy Wonka, and Emma Roberts. Teen angst stuff, I guess. Brutal reviews for this kind of thing.
Metacritic: 38

Green Lantern (trailer)
Director: Martin Campbell (Beyond Borders, The Legend of Zorro, Casino Royale, Edge of Darkness)
Personal Interest Factor: 5
Supposedly terrible, which is too bad, coming from the occasionally good Campbell. Can’t say that I quite understand the concept here – he has a ring that allows him to do whatever he wants? How is he vulnerable with a weapon like that? These are questions that are never really dealt with satisfactorily – even the Superman legend never really truly got around this kind of inherent flaw in its premise (Other supermen! Random aliens! Magic rocks!).
Metacritic: 40

Mr. Popper’s Penguins (trailer)
Director: (Mean Girls, Just Like Heaven, The Spiderwick Chronicles, Ghosts of Girlfriends Past)
Personal Interest Factor: 2
I don’t really see any possibility of this not being a total embarrassment for all involved.
Metacritic: 51

The Trip (trailer)
Director: Michael Winterbottom (9 Songs, Tristram Shandy: A Cock and Bull Story, A Mighty Heart, The Killer Inside Me)
Personal Interest Factor: 8
Looks funny. I enjoyed the hell out of Tristram Shandy, and this finds Steve Coogan and Rob Brydon on a random road trip. Brydon’s weirdly oblivious moronity is especially amusing to me.
Metacritic: 82

Film Noir: The Stranger

Standard

There are some who think that Orson Welles’ Citizen Kane used many techniques that would become common in film noir, namely the use of light and shadow. Citizen Kane did not have a film noir plot, but Welles would end up making films in the noir mold, such as The Lady From Shanghai, Touch of Evil, and The Stranger, from 1946.

The Stranger fits sort of sideways in the noir category. It’s not in a urban setting, and it’s not hard-boiled. The characters are well-to-do and educated, and the central crime is not about a small-time robbery–instead it’s the biggest crime of the 20th century. But it is a noir film, because the main character is the villain, while the hero is shoved aside to the periphery.

Welles stars as a Nazi war criminal–we are told he was the architect of the death camps–posing as a mild-mannered professor in a bucolic New England town. He’s being hunted by Edward G. Robinson and his task force, but they have no idea where he is, until his old colleague, who has suddenly found religion, tracks him down, with agents following him. The colleague leads Robinson to the small Connecticut town, but he loses him before he can pinpoint the Nazi’s precise whereabouts. Welles, realizing what’s happened, murders his old assistant and starts sweating it out.

This film is a masterpiece of tension. After a certain point, Welles knows Robinson is looking for him and Robinson knows Welles is his man (after a remark about Marx not being German, but a Jew–who else would think that way?) Welles, in order to blend in to the American upper-class, has married the daughter of a Supreme Court justice (Loretta Young), and he creates a cover story about being blackmailed by the brother of an ex-lover. Robinson has to convince her that she’s in danger, but she backs her husband–until the end, of course.

The film has masterful Welles’ touches, such as his repeated use of close-ups of smoking pipes, and his use of a clock tower in the town’s church. Robinson tells people that Welles was almost completely unknown to authorities, except for one thing–his obsession with clocks. Need I tell you that the climax of the film takes place in the clock tower?

The Stranger is also notable for it being the first film to actual film from the death camps. Robinson shows the film of piles of bodies and a gas chamber to Young to show her the man she married. It’s a powerful scene as we watch her, the reflected images flickering across her astonished face.

AGEBOC ’11 – June 17-19

Standard

Predict the #1 film for the weekend of June 17-19 2011.

The one who predicts closest to the total Friday to Sunday gross for the #1 film wins 4 points. Runner-up gains 2 points. Predicting within half a million earns 2 extra points.

Bonus questions:

1. Will Mr Poppers Penguins earn more or less than $25 million?

2. Will Super 8 earn more or less than $18 million this weekend?

Deadline is Thursday, June 16 11:59 pm (blog time).

To find out the rules of the game, go to the main thread for AGEBOC 09.

Current rankings:

Filmman 12.5
Jeanine 12.5
Jackrabbit Slim 12
Juan 10
Joe Webb 9
Nick 7
Brian 7
Marco Trevisiol 6
Rob Hunter 3
James 2

Review: Super 8

Standard

Brian DePalma made Hitchcockian films, Woody Allen made Bergmanesque films, and now J.J. Abrams has made a Spiebergian (Spielbergesque?) film, Super 8. The difference is that Spielberg himself has his fingerprints all over it, as he is one of the producers.

If this film isn’t as good as Spielberg’s best, it’s a blast, and if I were 13 I would have loved it even more, as it speaks to the kind of kid I was then, just like the kids in this movie, who are into monster magazines and making models (the site of a jar of Testor’s model paint gave me a Proustian rush). It’s set in 1979, which was my era, and I very much enjoyed the world that Abrams creates, down to the soundtrack and that a sheriff thinks a Walk-Man is a slippery slope to bad teen behavior.

The film is a hybrid of a childhood adventure and a monster movie–it’s like Stand By Me with aliens. A group of kids, led by the rotund Charles (Riley Griffiths), are working on a super 8 film for a festival. His best friend is Joe (Joel Courtney), who has recently lost his mother in an industrial accident. His father, the deputy sheriff (Kyle Chandler), is distant, and wants to send Joe to baseball camp for six weeks, because “it’s what we both need.”

Joe wants to stay and help Charles, and is delighted when he learns that his crush, Alice (Elle Fanning) is going to be in the movie. Like Joe, Alice is without a mother (a classic Disney tactic), and her father (Ron Eldard) is a drunk who’s in and out of trouble with the law. While out filming in the middle of the night at a train station, the kids witness a horrific train crash, when a pickup truck purposely drives into the oncoming train. Their camera records a key bit of information, and they end up trying to outwit the Air Force and their parents to figure out just what’s causing all the weird stuff going on in their town.

I won’t reveal too much more, but I will say there’s a monster involved, and in a classic Spielberg move, you don’t see much of him until the end (perhaps this all stems from the happy accident of Bruce the Shark’s mechanical problems in Jaws). The monster stuff isn’t nearly as interesting as the kids, and having the government be the bogeyman is a tired plot device.

But I loved the interaction between the kids, who are all good, particularly Courtney, Griffiths, and Fanning (who would be any 13-year-old boy’s crush). I don’t want to sound sexist, but this is really a boy’s film, from a male perspective, and Fanning’s character is a bit of a dream come true. It reminds me that Spielberg’s original title for E.T. was A Boy’s Life–this thing is dripping with the stuff that boys love, or at least did once upon a time.

The ending of the film does not exactly hold together. Like the film that Charles is making, some plot points get glided over. There’s a rather easy escape by a character from military custody, and when Joe and the creature meet face to face there’s some maudlin dialogue that seems straight out of a comic book. But this isn’t the kind of movie to spend too much time saying, “Wait a minute.” Instead it’s a movie about impressions, and drinking in the world of the film. I loved the look of the thing, especially the little Ohio town. I was kind of disappointed that they didn’t include a neighborhood movie theater with Alien on the marquee–it came out that summer.

Do stay through the credits, when Charles’ film is shown in its entirety, and has lots of laughs. Then stay and listen to the Knack sing “My Sharona,” and if you’re old enough, have a flashback.

My grade for Super 8: B+

Opening in Chicago, 06/10

Standard

Beginners (trailer)
Director: Mike Mills (Thumbsucker)
Personal Interest Factor: 7
R.E.M. bassist continues his second career as a film director with this whimsical-looking thing, which features a melancholy narration by Ewan McGregor and a subtitled but wise talking dog. Could go either way, being extremely trite and irritating or pleasantly offbeat and engaging. Hard to say, but reviews are surprisingly strong.
Metacritic: 81

Beautiful Boy (trailer)
Director: Shawn Ku
Personal Interest Factor: 6
A couple tries to repair (endure?) their marriage after their son commits a mass shooting/suicide while away at college. That sounds like a hideous thing to sit through, honestly, but as the couple is played by Charlie Sheen and Maria Bello, perhaps it’s worthwhile. Decent but underwhelming reviews on the whole.
Metacritic: 64

Film socialisme (trailer)
Director: Jean-Luc Godard (Nouvelle vague, For Ever Mozart, In Praise of Love, Notre musique)
Personal Interest Factor: 3
I’m torn between seeing this out of misplaced obligation – it’s a Godard film – and simply acknowledging that there’s almost no way I’ll actually enjoy it. I just see it as basically impossible that it’s not a big wank, since I find Godard to be extraordinarily tedious when in his overt analytical mode. I might just stay home and watch Breathless and/or The 400 Blows again.
Metacritic: 62

Submarine (trailer)
Director: Richard Ayoade
Personal Interest Factor: 5
Like Beginners, this could go either way, although this has a Aussie twist on it. Having seen both trailers multiple times, I think this one is a bit less appealing.
Metacritic: 78

Super 8 (trailer)
Director: J.J. Abrams (Mission: Impossible III, Star Trek)
Personal Interest Factor: 6
I wouldn’t have expected the new Richard Donner to make a movie about a discount hotel chain, but here we are. I guess I’m supposed to be really excited about it, but I am not affected by your Earth hype.
Metacritic: 72

AGEBOC ’11 – June 10-12

Standard

Predict the #1 film for the weekend of June 10-12 2011.

The one who predicts closest to the total Friday to Sunday gross for the #1 film wins 4 points. Runner-up gains 2 points. Predicting within half a million earns 2 extra points.

Bonus questions:

1. With Midnight in Paris expanding to over 750 theaters this weekend, do you believe it will earn more or less than 9 million for this weekend (not including previous total)?

2. Will Judy Moody and the Not Bummer Summer earn more or less than 8 million?

Deadline is Thursday, June 9 11:59 pm (blog time).

To find out the rules of the game, go to the main thread for AGEBOC 09.

Current rankings:

Jeanine 11.5
Jackrabbit Slim 11
Juan 9
Joe Webb 6.5
Nick 6.5
Brian 6
Filmman 5.5
Marco Trevisiol 5.5
Rob Hunter 2
James 2

Review–X-Men: First Class

Standard

Here’s what I liked about X-Men: First Class: Michael Fassbender’s charismatic performance, and a plethora of attractive actresses (Jennifer Lawrence, Rose Byrne, Zoe Kravitz, and January Jones, even if Jones can’t act). Here’s what I didn’t like about the movie: almost everything else.

I can usually tell when a movie isn’t working for me by how often I check my watch, and I was checking it almost every ten minutes. This film was a dull slog, and is actually worse than Brett Ratner’s third installment, which makes it the worst of the lot. It’s bad for different reasons, though–it’s just plain boring.

I haven’t been overwhelmed by any of the X-Men films, and to take away the one breakaway star of those films (as he was in the comics) Hugh Jackman as Wolverine, is a fatal misstep (he appears in a very short, amusing cameo). First Class is full of so much exposition, so much “who are you and what is your power” that the director and screenwriters almost forgot to include any action scenes.

This is a prequel, an explanation of how Charles Xavier and Eric Lensherr (James McAvoy and Fassbender) became acquainted as allies, and then became enemies under the names Professor X and Magneto. Some other familiar X-Men are on hand, such as Beast, Mystique, Emma Frost and several others who, while doing some Wikipedia work, I see all exist in the Marvel Universe. But like X3, there are so many of these dang mutants, some of them with vague powers, that it all becomes a blur.

The action is set in 1962, and the villain is Sebastian Shaw, a powerful mutant played by Kevin Bacon, chewing the scenery as if he were the baddie in a bad James Bond film. He is able to manipulate the Americans and Russians into the Cuban missile crisis, in the hopes that normal people wipe each other out and leave the Earth to mutants. It seems like a badly-thought out plan, and I couldn’t help but wonder where he was getting his money to build his own custom submarine.

Fassbender and McAvoy team up to stop him, and the climax at the blockade line around Cuba has some nice suspense, as does the final showdown between Fassbender and Bacon. But it’s a long wait to get there, with a lot of empty “be who you are” stuff. I’ve always maintained that the writers of the X-Men comic books were substituting mutants for homosexuals, and that was reinforced by hearing Hank McCoy (who becomes the Beast), say about his mutantism, “You didn’t ask, I didn’t tell.”

Some of the special effects work, but some of them are unbelievably cheesy. The Beast’s makeup is atrocious, and he looks like someone in a bad blue werewolf Halloween costume.

Fassbender is terrific, though, and I continue to be impressed by his presence. He would make a great James Bond. I did wonder, though, why a man from Eastern Europe has an Irish accent.

My grade for X-Men: First Class: D+

Review: Midnight in Paris

Standard

Pauline Kael wrote of Woody Allen’s The Purple Rose of Cairo, “I watched this movie almost purring with pleasure.” That’s how I feel about Midnight in Paris, the director’s latest film, which owes a great deal to Purple (which I thought was the best film of 1985), as well as his short humor pieces such as “A Twenties Memory” and “The Kugelmass Episode.”

Allen has always displayed an affection for fantasy, especially when it allows characters to interact with those of literature or history. The Purple Rose of Cairo had a movie character come off the screen and into the real world of the 1930s, while “The Kugelmass Episode” saw a middle-aged literature professor, through the aid of a magician’s cabinet, insert himself into the novel Madame Bovary, where he wooed the title character. Now Allen’s fascination with Paris in the ’20s (the subject of “A Twenties Memory, in which Allen is constantly being punched in the mouth by Ernest Hemingway) is brought to the screen.

The “Woody Allen” character in Midnight in Paris is played by Owen Wilson, who is a screenwriter on holiday in the French capital with his fiancee, Rachel MacAdams. Wilson is trying to write a novel, considering himself a hack screenwriter. MacAdams parents’ are visiting, and she wants to do touristy things and shop, while Wilson is enraptured by the romance of the city. To get us going, Allen, along with cinematographer Darius Khondji, starts the film with a lovely morning-to-night montage of beautiful scenes of the city, as he did with New York in the opening of Manhattan.

Wilson loves the city so much that it grates on MacAdams, who says she could never live outside the U.S. We quickly realize these two aren’t an ideal match, and if there’s a flaw in the film it’s that it’s hard to imagine how these two ever got together. Allen tries to have each character say something nice about the other, but MacAdams comes off as a villain.

Wilson, to get away from MacAdams and her overly-pedantic teacher friend (Michael Sheen, in a dead-on performance) wanders the streets. As the chimes ring midnight, a vintage Peugeot pulls up in front of him, and he is urged to get in. Without any explanation, he is transported back to the Paris of the 1920s, and he slowly realizes it when he recognizes Cole Porter and Scott and Zelda Fitzgerald. One of the charms of this film is how readily Wilson accepts what’s going on, and adapts to his situation. Later, he will tell Man Ray what’s going–that he inhabits two worlds, and Man Ray will tell him that it sounds perfectly normal. “But you’re a surrealist,” Wilson protests.

Wilson returns to the present after a while, but he learns how to return night after night. He meets Ernest Hemingway, who takes him to Gertrude Stein’s salon. She agrees to read his book, and while there he meets Pablo Picasso and his mistress (Marion Cotillard, in the only fictional character of the long-ago Paris sequences. Picasso had many mistresses, but a woman named Adriana was not one of them). Wilson and Cotillard are attracted to one another, but she tells him she would like to live in the Paris of the 1890s, La Belle Epoque.

Like a Swiss watch the the theme emerges–that nostalgia, which Sheen boorishly says is a form of denial of the present, is not all its cracked up to be. Everyone has a time they think is a golden age, only the people living in that age don’t think it’s so great. It’s a time-oriented version of “the grass is always greener.” Cotillard tells Wilson she thinks her time is boring, and he can’t believe it.

This film is manna for humanities majors. The packed house I saw it with gave out gasps of recognition laughter every time they figured out who a person was, such as Adrien Brody’s cameo as Salvador Dali. In a way, it’s a form of self-congratulation, that the audience “gets” what Allen is joking about and can feel smart about it. There are many inside jokes, my favorites being a reference about Djuna Barnes leading while dancing (she was a well-known Lesbian) and Wilson pitching a plot to Luis Bunuel about a dinner party not being able to leave the room (Bunuel would make that movie in the 1970s–The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie).

But if there’s a lot of name-dropping in Midnight in Paris it’s perfectly acceptable, as the film is too whimsical to take seriously but instead a continuous delight. I would have never thought Wilson would be right for an Allen film, but he is perfect, not doing an Allen impersonation (like Kenneth Branagh did in Celebrity) but keeping his own shaggy-dog persona while reading lines that one can imagine Allen saying.

As for the rest of the cast, there are many delights. Tom Hiddleston makes a fine Fitzgerald (from Loki to F. Scott Fitzgerald–what a spring for Mr. Hiddleston) and Corey Stoll has fun with Hemingway, speaking the terse, simple prose that Hemingway is known for. “Who wants to fight!” he exclaims at one point. Kathy Bates is a natural for Gertrude Stein, and Brody’s brief turn as Dali is as surreal as that artist’s works. His key word is “rhinoceros.”

After more than a decade of hit-and-mostly-miss for Allen, I think Midnight in Paris is his best film since Bullets Over Broadway, and it’s fine to have him back at the top of his game.

My grade for Midnight in Paris: A.