Review: Jurassic World


“People. They never learn.” So says a character in Jurassic World, the latest cynically-made blockbuster that’s now north of $600 million in earnings, domestic. It proves a point that Hollywood has taken to heart–the masses love familiarity.

I had planned on skipping this, but a family I’m friends with wanted to go and I tagged along, figuring what the hell. It was pretty much exactly as I thought it would be. There were some chills, but it was awfully dumb, illogical, with bad science and deviated little from the template of the first film, Jurassic Park, which it referenced like a name-dropping friend.

Jurassic World is not a reboot, it’s simply the fourth in the series. The first park, which ended in tragedy based on hubris, is now reopened and doing great business. But, as manager Bryce Dallas Howard points out, you need something new every so often to keep the people interested. She could have been talking about Hollywood.

So, in accordance with the owner’s (Irrfan Kahn) wishes, a super-dinosaur has been genetically cooked up. It is called Indominus Rex, and makes T-Rex looks like a puppy in comparison. It is about to be unveiled when Kahn calls on an employee (Chris Pratt), who is the resident velociraptor trainer. He’s checking out the safety of the Indominus’s paddock when the thing breaks loose. Uh oh!

Here’s where movie logic takes an interesting turn away from real-life. Instead of immediately evacuating the park and blowing the wayward reptile to smithereens with a missile, profits are always the bottom line. Wrongful death suits don’t seem to occur to these people. Also, the park is on an island with no easy way to evacuate 20,000 people anyway, which seems like a fly in the ointment. I hate corporations as much as anyone, but this exceeds their day-to-day villainy, I think.

They also want to catch the thing alive, but outwits at them at every turn. I do admit I love to see people being eaten by dinosaurs. The scene in The Lost World: Jurassic Park in which Richard Schiff is torn apart by two T-Rex’s like a wishbone has stayed with me forever. There’s nothing quite as good as that here, perhaps except for the woman who is snatched by a pterodactyl, which is then eaten by a mososaur.

Jurassic World also has two other targets–science and the military. Hubris in science has been a topic in literature since Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, but instead of megalomania–playing God–today’s scientific arrogance is about profits. They built this dinosaur to meet shareholder demand, and, I guess, because they could.

Another subplot involves Vincent D’Onofrio as the head of a private security firm that wants to weaponize dinosaurs. He sees an army of velociraptors mowing down the enemy. But, as the saying goes, who will watch the watchmen?

In a blatant rip-off of the first film, two relatives of an employee, in this case nephews of Howard, are our eyes in the park, as they, predictably, ignore orders to come back and end up almost being eaten by several dinosaurs. I should add that Jurassic World has an anti-feminist streak–Howard is set up as some sort of monster because she doesn’t want kids and has trouble remembering her nephew’s names and ages. So we get the less than subtle message that a woman is not complete without exercising her nurturing instinct. You’ve come a long way, baby. I will give Howard and her stuntwoman an award for best running in high heels.

The best thing I can say about Jurassic World, other than Chris Pratt’s amiable star power (he’s been on quite a roll) is that the special effects have become so great that I find myself thinking of these creatures as real. It’s uncanny, really. It’s a shame that the writing can’t keep up (there is, believe it or not, a shot of a dinosaur in a rearview mirror. Been there, done that).

My grade for Jurassic World: C-.


About Jackrabbit Slim

Location: Vegas, Baby! I’m much older than the other whippersnappers here, a baby boomer. I tend to be more snobbish about film, disdaining a lot of the multiplex fare for “cinema.” My favorite films: Woody Allen’s oeuvre (up until about 1990), The Godfather, The Graduate, A Hard Day’s Night, Pulp Fiction. Politics: Well, George McGovern was my political hero. I’m also a prickly atheist. Occupation: Poised to be an English teacher in Las Vegas. For many years I was an editor at Penthouse Magazine. My role on this blog seems to be writing lots of reviews and being the resident Oscar maven.

2 responses »

  1. Howard’s arc is basically Neil’s arc from the first film. I find it ridiculous that transferring that arc to a woman is somehow being considered anti-feminist. The bigger problem is that it’s derivative.

    As for me, I quite liked the film – even though it’s dumb as a box of rocks. It nails the nostalgia. The action and effects are great. Pratt is a good action hero. And the final showdown is magic.

    I’d say it’s a solid B. Easily superior to the first two sequels, but not even close to the original, which is one of my favorite films.

  2. This was terrible, across the board. Just horrible.
    And you’re right, there’s always a small twinge of excitement at the prospect and then the actual showing of people being eaten by dinosaurs.
    But this was about as stupid as things get. Just because dinosaurs are herbivores doesn’t mean they’re harmless. Kayaking among dinosaurs. Totally asinine.
    Oh, well…there will be 4 more and they’ll be huge.
    Still…it was better than the second Avengers movie.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.